Keywords
desert soil
trace elements
biological absorption coefficient
biogeochemistry
soil–plant interaction
bioaccumulation
arid ecosystem
neutron activation analysis
How to Cite
Article Metrics
Abstract
The biogeochemical distribution of trace elements in desert soil–plant systems is of considerable importance for understanding element migration, nutrient cycling, and ecological adaptation in arid ecosystems. The aim of this study was to investigate the vertical distribution of Cr, Sc, Co, and Cs in desert soils and to evaluate their biological absorption by the medicinal plant Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. Soil samples collected from two profile horizons (0–28 and 28–48 cm) and leaf samples of S. marianum were analyzed using the neutron activation analysis method. The biological absorption coefficient (BAC) was calculated to evaluate the transfer of trace elements from soil to plant tissues. The results showed that the concentrations of Cr, Sc, Co, and Cs increased with soil depth, indicating limited vertical migration and the predominant influence of parent material on trace-element distribution. Chromium exhibited the highest concentration in plant leaves, whereas scandium showed the lowest accumulation. The calculated BAC values followed the sequence Cr -0.039 > Co-0.015 > Cs- 0.013 > Sc- 0.010, with all values remaining below 0.1, indicating weak biological uptake under desert conditions. The findings demonstrate that trace-element distribution in the studied soil–plant system is controlled by the combined effects of soil geochemical characteristics and plant physiological selectivity. The low biological absorption coefficients indicate limited phytoavailability of the investigated elements and suggest that Silybum marianum can serve as a suitable bioindicator for assessing trace-element mobility and soil–plant biogeochemical interactions in desert ecosystems. These results provide a scientific basis for ecological monitoring and the sustainable management of medicinal plant resources in arid regions.
References
1. Hakimova, N., & Abdualiyeva, S. (2026). Biogeochemistry of Sandy Desert Soils in the Bukhara Oasis and the Sparse-Leaved Yantok (Alhagi sparsifolia) Plant (A Case Study of Shofirkon District). J Open, 2(01), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.70728/jopen.be.0126.002
2. Huang, K., Wang, J., Kuai, J., Liu, X., Ou, J., Miao, J., Huang, K., & Lin, J. (2026). Effects of forest-medicinal plant intercropping on soil carbon pools in coastal saline-alkali land. Plant and Soil, 520(2), 1307–1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08327-8
3. Kumar, A., Singh, H. S., Kumar, A., Singh, M. P., Singh, A., Maurya, N. K., Darbha, S., & Kumar, R. (2025). A Comprehensive Review on Plant-Soil Interactions: Microbial Dynamics, Nutrient Cycling and Sustainable Crop Production. Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 11(2), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2025/v11i2509
4. Xing, Y., Xie, Y., & Wang, X. (2025). Enhancing soil health through balanced fertilization: a pathway to sustainable agriculture and food security. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1536524
5. Yaseen, U., Nurbaity, A., & Fitriatin, B. N. (2026). Ecological significance of soil microbes in sustaining soil health through nutrient cycling, carbon sequestration, and structural integrity. Discover Soil, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00222-z
6. Prakash, I., Achari, K. S., Jawade, C. P., Kumar, P., Parihar, P., Meena, M., K., Malav, A., & Maheswari, B. S. (2025). Soil microbiome dynamics: Implications for soil health and sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research, 9(6), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i6c.4507
7. T, T. K., R, T. V., & C, R. (2025). Impact of Climate Change on Soil Health and Nutrient Cycling: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 15(11), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2025/v15i115132
8. Li, S., Song, Y., Liu, M., Yang, X., Xu, G., Ma, B., Xu, J., & He, Y. (2026). Integrating evolution and ecology on microbial dehalogenation to advance sustainable soil health. Soil Ecology Letters, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-026-0426-3
9. Zaman, W., Ayaz, A., & Puppe, D. (2025). Biogeochemical Cycles in Plant–Soil Systems: Significance for Agriculture, Interconnections, and Anthropogenic Disruptions. Biology, 14(4), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14040433
10. Qasim, M., Babar, S., Younas, M. U., Memon, S. P., Abd‐Elkader, A. M., Xia, X., Farooqi, Z. U. R., Iqbal, R., & Jiang, C. (2026). Restoring Acidic Soils for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review of Mechanisms, Microbial Shifts, and Climate Resilience. Land Degradation &Amp; Development, 37(11), 5961–5981. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70563
11. Yaculak, A. M., Kan, J., Peipoch, M., Galella, J. G., Peck, E. K., Kaushal, S. S., Trammell, T. L. E., & Inamdar, S. P. (2025). Biogeochemical recovery and role of ancient hydric soils in contemporary floodplain restorations. Ecological Engineering, 220, 107733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107733
12. Amundson, R. (2022). Soil biogeochemistry and the global agricultural footprint. Soil Security, 6, 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2021.100022
13. Alfonso, V. M., Groffman, P. M., Cheng, Z., & Seidemann, D. E. (2025). Ancient clays support contemporary biogeochemical activity in the Critical Zone. Biogeosciences, 22(13), 3357–3373. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3357-2025
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Gulnara R. Tastanbekova, Diyora Y. Salimova (Author)